Williams, Andy2024-03-162024-03-162021-10-28https://doi.org/10.31730/osf.io/2zbyqhttps://africarxiv.ubuntunet.net/handle/1/708https://doi.org/10.60763/africarxiv/664https://doi.org/10.60763/africarxiv/664https://doi.org/10.60763/africarxiv/664This comment is in reply to the paper “On the complexity of extending the convergence region for Traub’s method” [1]. In complexity science, from the mathematical perspective, discussions of complexity often concern algorithmic complexity such as in the paper responded to here [2]. But this is only one of the kinds of complexity that exists even in the mathematical domain. There is also the complexity in the behavior of a system of equations; there is the complexity of the reasoning or algorithm required to understand a system of equations (“understand” interpreted here as defining the problem needing to be solved); and, as mentioned, there is the complexity of the reasoning or algorithm required to solve a system of equations.absolute truthHuman-Centric Functional Modelingoptimizationrelative truth