Diercks, MichealRao, Meghana2024-03-192024-03-192019-08-13https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3367166https://africarxiv.ubuntunet.net/handle/1/954https://doi.org/10.60763/africarxiv/907https://doi.org/10.60763/africarxiv/907https://doi.org/10.60763/africarxiv/907In Kipsigis (Nilotic, Kenya), declarative-embedding complementizers can agree with both main-clause subjects (Subj-CA) and main-clause objects (Obj-CA). Subj-CA agrees with the closest super-ordinate subject (even in the context of intervening objects), cannot agree with non-subjects or embedded subjects, and yields an interpretation where the embedded clause is the main point of the utterance. Obj-CA can only target main-clause objects and can only occur on a complementizer already bearing Subj-CA; Obj-CA contributes a verum focus reading to the clause. The paper briefly considers the analytical implications of these patterns.Kipsigisobjectscomplementizer agreementembedded clause