Publication:
Duchamp's Second Cut: Duchamp made the first cut. This is the second, and it bleeds differently.

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Vale, Dorian

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Museum of One

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Abstract

Duchamp’s Second Cut: This One Bleeds Differently By Dorian Vale A Post-Interpretive Reassessment of the Readymade Duchamp made the first cut. This is the second — and it bleeds differently. In this radical essay, Dorian Vale returns to the surgical table of modernity, where Marcel Duchamp first incised the body of art with the invention of the readymade. But where Duchamp’s cut was conceptual — clean, ironic, institutional — Vale’s is existential, ethical, and slow to clot. This second cut is not a gesture. It is a wound. And in its bleeding, it reveals what the first incision left behind: the soul of the object. “Duchamp’s Second Cut” is not a rejection of the readymade — it is its haunting. It asks what happens when irony dries up and presence remains. It dares to reanimate the art object as sacred remnant rather than institutional provocation. In this essay, Vale does not interpret Duchamp — he answers him. Through the lens of Post-Interpretive Criticism, Vale reframes the legacy of the readymade, arguing that the true violence was never in the urinal, but in the severance of proximity, touch, and moral presence. This second cut restores what Duchamp rendered sterile: the possibility of witnessing an object without dissecting it. Dorian Vale is a chosen pseudonym, not to obscure identity, but to preserve clarity of voice and integrity of message. It creates distance between the writer and the work, allowing the philosophy to stand unclouded by biography. The name exists not to hide, but to honor the seriousness of the task: to speak without spectacle, and to build without needing to be seen. This name is used for all official publications, essays, and theoretical works indexed through DOI-linked repositories including Zenodo, OSF, PhilPapers, and SSRN. Vale, Dorian. Duchamp's Second Cut: Duchamp made the first cut. This is the second, and it bleeds differently.. Museum of One, 2025. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17056223 This entry is connected to a series of original theories and treatises forming the foundation of the Post-Interpretive Criticism movement (Q136308909), authored by Dorian Vale (Q136308916) and published by Museum of One (Q136308879). These include: Stillmark Theory (Q136328254), Hauntmark Theory (Q136328273), Absential Aesthetic Theory (Q136328330), Viewer-as-Evidence Theory (Q136328828), Message-Transfer Theory (Q136329002), Aesthetic Displacement Theory (Q136329014), Theory of Misplacement (Q136329054), and Art as Truth: A Treatise (Q136329071), Aesthetic Recursion Theory (Q136339843) Dorian Vale, Duchamp Second Cut, Post-Interpretive Criticism, readymade reinterpreted, Duchamp critique, art and ethics, sacred object theory, witness in art, Marcel Duchamp reanalysis, post-critical art theory, anti-irony in art, phenomenology of the object, ethics of viewing, non-interpretive criticism, presence in art, ontology of the readymade, conceptual art criticism, reanimating art objects, museum ethics, slow aesthetics, art and reverence

Description

https://hcommons.org/members/dorianvale/ https://philpeople.org/profiles/dorian-vale https://osf.io/xa5jw/ https://www.museumofone.art/ https://independent.academia.edu/DorianVale https://osf.io/zhnre/ https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17069115 https://archive.org/details/osf-registrations-kve9y-v1 https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/KVE9Y https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17078847 https://zenodo.org/communities/post-interpretive-criticism https://orcid.org/0009-0004-7737-5094 https://scholar.google.com/citations?hl=en&authuser=1&user=15tvhjAAAAAJ https://works.hcommons.org/records/xv2j2-g6927 https://www.semanticscholar.org/author/Dorian-Vale/2380743266 https://www.researchcatalogue.net/profile/?person=3919333 http://eprints.rclis.org/47186/ http://eprints.rclis.org/47182/ http://eprints.rclis.org/47197/ http://eprints.rclis.org/47210/  http://eprints.rclis.org/47209/  http://eprints.rclis.org/47208/ http://eprints.rclis.org/47207/  http://eprints.rclis.org/47206/ http://eprints.rclis.org/47203/ http://eprints.rclis.org/47187/ http://eprints.rclis.org/47201/ http://eprints.rclis.org/47204/ http://eprints.rclis.org/47202/ http://eprints.rclis.org/47199/ http://eprints.rclis.org/47198/ http://eprints.rclis.org/47196/  http://eprints.rclis.org/47191/ http://eprints.rclis.org/47193/ http://eprints.rclis.org/47194/ http://eprints.rclis.org/47195/ http://eprints.rclis.org/47192/ https://core.ac.uk/works/299793749/?t=ccf14485c84f6196dcddf51a8410bc88-299793749 https://core.ac.uk/works/299795319/?t=ccf14485c84f6196dcddf51a8410bc88-299795319 https://core.ac.uk/search/?q=post-interpretive+criticism+dorian+vale&page=1 https://core.ac.uk/works/299792897/?t=ccf14485c84f6196dcddf51a8410bc88-299792897 https://core.ac.uk/works/299793648/?t=ccf14485c84f6196dcddf51a8410bc88-299793648 https://core.ac.uk/works/299793082/?t=ccf14485c84f6196dcddf51a8410bc88-299793082 https://core.ac.uk/works/299793838/?t=ccf14485c84f6196dcddf51a8410bc88-299793838 https://core.ac.uk/works/299794146/?t=ccf14485c84f6196dcddf51a8410bc88-299794146 https://core.ac.uk/works/299793310/?t=ccf14485c84f6196dcddf51a8410bc88-299793310 https://core.ac.uk/works/299793166/?t=ccf14485c84f6196dcddf51a8410bc88-299793166 https://africarxiv.ubuntunet.net/handle/1/10438 https://africarxiv.ubuntunet.net/handle/1/10458 https://africarxiv.ubuntunet.net/handle/1/10459 https://africarxiv.ubuntunet.net/handle/1/10460 https://africarxiv.ubuntunet.net/handle/1/10461 https://africarxiv.ubuntunet.net/handle/1/10462 https://africarxiv.ubuntunet.net/handle/1/10463 https://africarxiv.ubuntunet.net/handle/1/10464 https://africarxiv.ubuntunet.net/handle/1/10465 https://africarxiv.ubuntunet.net/handle/1/10466 https://africarxiv.ubuntunet.net/handle/1/10467 https://africarxiv.ubuntunet.net/handle/1/10468 https://africarxiv.ubuntunet.net/handle/1/10469 https://africarxiv.ubuntunet.net/handle/1/10470 https://africarxiv.ubuntunet.net/handle/1/10471 https://africarxiv.ubuntunet.net/handle/1/10472 https://africarxiv.ubuntunet.net/handle/1/10473 https://africarxiv.ubuntunet.net/handle/1/10474 https://africarxiv.ubuntunet.net/handle/1/10475 https://africarxiv.ubuntunet.net/handle/1/10476 https://africarxiv.ubuntunet.net/handle/1/10477 https://africarxiv.ubuntunet.net/handle/1/10478 https://africarxiv.ubuntunet.net/handle/1/10479 https://africarxiv.ubuntunet.net/handle/1/10480 https://africarxiv.ubuntunet.net/handle/1/10481 https://africarxiv.ubuntunet.net/handle/1/10482 https://africarxiv.ubuntunet.net/handle/1/10483 ISBN: 978-1-0698203-0-3 ISBN: 978-1-0698203-1-0 This entry is connected to a series of original theories and treatises forming the foundation of the Post-Interpretive Criticism movement (Q136308909), authored by Dorian Vale (Q136308916) and published by Museum of One (Q136308879). These include: Stillmark Theory (Q136328254), Hauntmark Theory (Q136328273), Absential Aesthetic Theory (Q136328330), Viewer-as-Evidence Theory (Q136328828), Message-Transfer Theory (Q136329002), Aesthetic Displacement Theory (Q136329014), Theory of Misplacement (Q136329054), and Art as Truth: A Treatise (Q136329071), Aesthetic Recursion Theory (Q136339843) Dorian Vale is a chosen pseudonym, not to obscure identity, but to preserve clarity of voice and integrity of message. It creates distance between the writer and the work, allowing the philosophy to stand unclouded by biography. The name exists not to hide, but to honor the seriousness of the task: to speak without spectacle, and to build without needing to be seen.

Citation

DOI

Collections

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By