Exploring the impact of a story-based teacher training programme on language and early literacy in 4- and 5-year-olds. Teachers at the core: Was the programme useful, feasible and easy to implement?
| dc.contributor.author | Visser, Monique | |
| dc.contributor.author | Oakhill, Jane | |
| dc.contributor.author | Cain, Kate | |
| dc.contributor.author | O'Carroll, Shelley | |
| dc.contributor.author | de Wet, Katherine | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-07-19T14:48:42Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2024-07-19T14:48:42Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2023 | |
| dc.description | More information about the Little Stars training programme and materials can be found at: www.wordworks.org.za | |
| dc.description.abstract | This is the second in a series of five research briefs that explore the impact of Little Stars, a story-based teacher training programme on language and early literacy in 4- and 5-year-olds. This brief focuses on the effectiveness of the training and the teachers’ feedback on their learning and implementation. | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | The project was funded by a British Academy research grant (ECE 190079). The research briefs were funded by the Lancaster University FST Impact Fund. | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Visser, M., O’Carroll, S., Oakhill, J., Cain, K., & de Wet, K. (2023). Exploring the impact of a story-based teacher training programme on language and early literacy in 4- and 5-year-olds. Teachers at the core: Was the programme useful, feasible and easy to implement? Wordworks: Cape Town. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://africarxiv.ubuntunet.net/handle/1/1590 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.60763/africarxiv/1499 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Wordworks | |
| dc.subject | ECD | |
| dc.subject | Storytelling | |
| dc.subject | early language | |
| dc.subject | early literacy | |
| dc.subject | teacher development | |
| dc.title | Exploring the impact of a story-based teacher training programme on language and early literacy in 4- and 5-year-olds. Teachers at the core: Was the programme useful, feasible and easy to implement? |